The recent situation in the stock market has left most wondering how and by what means they can make some gains; or for that matter just not incur losses and preserve their capital to the extent possible without any erosion.
With some mix and match, investors can reduce the risk and save their capital from eroding. By making some informed decisions and application of some proven investments principles that have withstood the test of good as well as not so good times in the stock market.
Let’s start with an example.
Ajay and Vijay, both in their early thirties are employed at a reputed MNC company. Both of them are active investors in the stock market, keen followers of its movements. Their experience in the stock market and the continuous flow of information through various mediums like newspapers, internet, and television has made them aware of that equity gives the highest possible returns over the long-term. Also their experience has taught them how to go about asset allocation. Ajay and Vijay both have split their investible surplus in equity as well as debt. Both invest their surplus in a 70: 30 equity-debt ratio.
But the recent market slump has baffled even them as to what strategy they need to adopt; they are in a state of panic and do not know what to do to save their investments or at least prevent capital erosion.
Most people are aware of the fact that they need to hold their investments for the long term for better gains; but here the point - what is long term? And how do we know that this is the right time to sell or buy? I have come across people who told me that if they would have had sold their portfolio in January 2008, they would have definitely made good gains. But then, at the time there was this positivity all over with everyone expecting the BSE index to reach 25000+. And now that the markets have climbed downwards these same people are expecting the index to touch lower levels. There is no way to find as to whether the indices have reached their peak or they have bottomed out. Markets are sentiments driven. You can is no way time the market.
There is no simple way out. You need to be patient and more importantly, there is no need to keep your distance from the market. Here is another question: What should the retail investor in the present situation and till the time the markets return back to their original glory?
The answer is ‘constant mix portfolio rebalancing’ and Ajay has adopted this strategy. His financial planner suggested that this would insulate him from market turbulence while ensuring that he remains the king of good times.
So, what is constant mix portfolio rebalancing? And how does it work?
Constant mix rebalancing is where you calculate the initial proportion of each investment in the portfolio and then maintain that ratio at all times.
As investments go, equity investments give a far higher rate of return than debt investments. Debt returns are more conservative, usually pegged at 10% year-on-year. Hence, over a longish period, an equity-debt portfolio that starts off as a 70-30 split can become lopsided in the equity section’s favor.
So, you constantly rebalance your portfolio by liquidating enough of your profits from the equity section of your portfolio and transferring it into the debt side, to keep up the 70-30 split between equity and debt.
Given below are the tables that tell two tales - Vijay who started off with his 70-30 split but didn’t bother to rebalance, preferring to buy and hold. And Ajay, who did indeed rebalance his portfolio every year to keep up the 70-30 equity-debt split.
Vijay’s portfolio
|
Proportion Of Total Investment |
70% |
30% |
100% |
||
|
Period |
Market Growth |
Sensex |
Amount Invested in Equity (Rs.) |
Amount Invested in Debt (Rs.) |
Total Portfolio Value in (Rs) |
| Year 1 |
Base |
6000 |
70000 |
30000 |
100000 |
| Year 2 |
Up 30% |
7800 |
91000 |
33000 |
124000 |
| Year 3 |
Up 30% |
10140 |
118300 |
36300 |
154600 |
| Year 4 |
Up 30% |
13182 |
153790 |
39930 |
193720 |
| Year 5 |
Down 70% |
3955 |
46137 |
43923 |
90060 |
| 34% loss in the equity section of Vijay’s portfolio at the end of year 5 - from 70000 to 46137. | |||||
|
Ajay’ portfolio
|
|||||
|
Period |
Market Growth |
Sensex |
Amount Invested in Equity (Rs.) |
Amount Invested in Debt (Rs.) |
Total Portfolio Value in (Rs) |
| Year 1 |
Base |
6000 |
70000 |
30000 |
100000 |
|
|
|
(70%) |
(30%) |
(100%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year 2 |
Up 30% |
7800 |
91000 |
33000 |
124000 |
| After rebalancing |
|
86800 |
37200 |
124000 |
|
|
|
(91000-4200) |
(33000+4200) |
|
||
|
|
|
(70%) |
(30%) |
(100%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year 3 |
Up 30% |
10140 |
112840 |
40920 |
153760 |
| After rebalancing |
|
107632 |
46128 |
153760 |
|
|
|
(112840-5208) |
(40920+5208) |
|
||
|
|
|
(70%) |
(30%) |
(100%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year 4 |
Up 30% |
13182 |
139922 |
50741 |
190663 |
| After rebalancing |
|
133464 |
57199 |
190663 |
|
|
|
(139922-6458) |
(50741+6458) |
|
||
|
|
|
(70%) |
(30%) |
(100%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year 5 | Down 70% |
3955 |
40039 |
62919 |
102958 |
| After prompt equity profit transfer to his debt section, Ajay only has a 15.66% loss on his equity investments over the five years. But his capital has grown! | |||||
Look at year 2. The equity investment grew at 30% while debt plodded on at a steady 10%. The total corpus at the end of year two was Rs. 124,000. But the equity-debt split is no longer 70-30.
So, Ajay calculates:
70% of 124000 = 86800, while his equity holdings total 91,000, an extra 4200. So, Ajay transfers this to the debt section, thus keeping the 70-30 ratio intact.
What happens when Ajay keeps doing this? In year 5, when the stock market goes to the dogs, Ajay’s losses in his equity investments are eminently minimal. But more importantly, he has managed to avoid capital erosion.
Vijay, on the other hand, sticking to his buy-and-hold policy, suffers a 34% loss on his equity capital plus huge capital erosion.
Portfolio rebalancing is vital part of investment policy. There can be no asset allocation target without the discipline to preserve that target. Buy low sell-high strategy has most of the times been advocated by experts but greedy investors always fail to follow this principle. Constant mix rebalancing is mechanism for sensible timing of index movement. Through this process the investor naturally buys low and sells high and the most important benefit is it reduces the risk to greater extent ensuring adequately diversified portfolio.







