Apna Loan  |  Apna Insurance  |  Apna Investment


Tag Archive | "high risk-high return"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Insurers to park funds in VCs

Posted on 05 November 2008 by Ushma Shah

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Personal_Finance/Insurance/Insurance_news/Insurers_set_to_park_funds_in_VC_firms/articleshow/3429548.cms

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDA) gave the green signal to insurance companies to invest in venture capital funds (VCs). Investing in VCs will expose the insurance companies to a huge amount of risk as VCs are high-risk high-return. The insurance companies will have to work out which VC they should invest and how much. The objective of the VC in which they would be investing should be very clear as it would be the deciding factor on the investment returns. The things to be checked are solvency ratio, percentage share in the venture capital, exit clause, and the management track record.

With the world economy facing a recession and economic giant USA adopting the fetal position, the VC concept that has been the driving force of the dotcom boom, has burst. Result: Nightmare for VCs.

Insurance companies will have a large corpus to invest in VCs. In which case, they should have decision-making rights in the VC. This is important to protect the insurer’s insurance customers.

Comments (10)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

What’s going wrong in the US banking sector??!!

Posted on 01 October 2008 by Durva Lakhlani

We read it in the papers, see it in the news, hear about it everyday - ABC bank has gone bust; they are waiting for XYZ bank to be taken over etc.

What is happening with these companies and how did it all start?

Let us look at the basics of how this started.

For banks (lenders): About four years ago, banks came up with a new financial product and found that they could package the loans or other assets on their balance sheet and sell them in return for immediate liquidity. This would give them liquid funds which could be lent further to increase business.

Hence, with more funds at their disposal, they started lending more money, even to people who would not have been eligible borrowers otherwise. Loans were made to to people who did not have perfect or good credit history or a steady income stream; these were called sub-prime loans. Slowly various others such products related to loans were created and gained popularity; these products had higher risk but also higher returns for banks.
Meanwhile property prices were soaring. A look at the statistics shows property prices in the US (where this problem is the biggest) rose 53% in the five years ended December 2007. People, on the other hand, had started buying more homes with mortgage loans, now easily available from banks. The rise in property prices was not entirely due to healthy demand and supply factors, but more due to this easily available money. This fueled the construction industry, property markets, etc.

For investing companies (which included banks): The loans that were packaged (securitized) and sold by banks were held as collateral against which securities were issued to investors (which are generally financial companies). These securities, called asset backed securities (ABS), could be traded in the secondary market. The repayments on the loans that were held as the collateral would provide for returns and principal repayment to these investors.

Start of the crisis: As interest rates kept increasing, the monthly installments payable by mortgage loan borrowers started rising. Slowly, borrowers started defaulting on their loan repayments. This raised the level of non-performing assets or problem loans for banks.
These defaults also led to disturbance in the cash flow to ABS investors. The risks related to this type of securities increased and their market value consequently decreased. The investors started incurring losses which decreased the viability of these securities. Soon the market for these securities slackened and losses (both realized and marked to market) started eating into investors’ profits and affected capital negatively.
Besides, banks could no longer easily securitize their assets. This led to lower availability of funds and hence low business volumes. Since loan disbursement was now selective, investment in property was lower and property prices started declining due to lack of demand. This in turn decreased the value of collateral for mortgage loans given by banks and increased the risk attached.

Securitization of loans led to more funds with banks, higher and riskier lending, defaults on repayments, losses for banks and ABS investors which made a large hit on profits and capital. All these things were hence interlinked and one after the other led to weakening of the entire system.

Thanks to the more-than-adequate regulation by the RBI this has not happened in India. However, let’s see how much this affects Indian Banks and the economy indirectly.

Comments (13)

Advertise Here

Advertise Here
  • CALENDAR

      January 2009
      M T W T F S S
      « Dec    
       1234
      567891011
      12131415161718
      19202122232425
      262728293031  


Disclaimer

The Apnapaisa Blog specifically disclaims any responsibility for any loss, actual or consequential, caused due to any decisions taken on the basis of any material appearing on the blog. Please consult your personal finance advisor, insurance agent, or broker before taking any decision to buy any financial product.